Subsidy is Gone! A Smart Decision but Improperly Timed By Godwin.JP

Just while we were still dealing with the agony of naira scarcity, mounting insecurity, a faltering economy, tremendous debt, abject poverty, and a corrupt political class. Nigerians were slammed again with the announcement of the removal of fuel subsidies, causing the price of petrol to triple.

This most recent decision by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s new administration has stirred debates and conversations across Nigeria. While the move is considered as a wise long-term decision, questions have been raised regarding its timing. Typically, there are advantages and disadvantages to any government move, which I will try to emphasize. As unpleasant as the removal of fuel subsidies may be, it has potential benefits, but the difficulties caused by the timing of this decision are unwarranted, leaving Nigerians in a difficult position.

Yes, it is true that removing fuel subsidies makes the economy more efficient, productive, and long-term sustainable. Subsidies frequently put a pressure on government finances, diverting cash away from other critical sectors like healthcare, education, and infrastructure development. A deeper look reveals how the withdrawal of subsidies can give much-needed relief, allowing governments to redirect resources to other important objectives and manage fiscal deficits.

As previously said, one of the downsides of this decision is the timing. Nigerians are currently agitated, showing how inept our leaders can be when it comes to communication. Simply raising awareness across Nigeria will go a long way toward providing relief to Nigerians. Every leader must consider the social impact of each choice, as well as the negative impacts on vulnerable populations, particularly those who rely largely on them for basic requirements. Proper measures should have been put in place to support the most vulnerable individuals and communities during this transition. It is critical to create alternative support systems on time in order to prevent any negative social impacts.

Nigerians had little time to plan or prepare as a result of that single decision. Industries, entrepreneurs, and small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) that rely significantly on this and need to plan and adjust may risk substantial disruptions as they shift to the new economic landscape. These industries or individuals may require additional time to adjust, restructure their operations, and experiment with new business strategies. In the short term, the rapid elimination of fuel subsidies may result in job losses, diminished competitiveness, and economic instability.

In some cases, the removal will definitely result in temporary price hikes or market imbalances. Consumers could experience increased costs for essential goods and services before market forces stabilize. These short-term disruptions can strain household and family budgets and create discontent among the populace.

This decision is a smart long-term strategy that can enhance economic efficiency, relieve fiscal burdens, and promote sustainable practices. However, careful consideration should have been given to the timing and implementation.

It is admirable that the government develops policies, but those policies must be made known to the public. Every government decision must be explained to the public. Sensitization should be carried out properly. Even after sensitization, not all Nigerians would agree, but the administration will have drawn a large number of them to accepting the decision.

The government should have considered going to remote communities and translating in Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo. Again, governmental policies must be understood by the general public, and the government must ensure that this is feasible.

I am hopeful that the new government would prioritize communication, especially in the area of public relations strategies to communicate their policies.

Finally, governments should put in place suitable support systems to aid vulnerable populations and facilitate the smooth transition of affected enterprises. By addressing these issues, the potential benefits of eliminating fuel subsidies can be obtained while limiting the negative effects of an ill-timed choice.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button